Discussion Forum on Community-Centered Adaptation:
Community-Centered Design and Implementation:
Participatory Planning: Communities were involved from the start to identify vulnerable areas and prioritize embankment upgrades. Local knowledge shaped the engineering designs.
Inclusive Engagement: Women, fishers, farmers, and marginalized groups were included in decision-making forums.
Capacity Building: Local committees were trained to maintain embankments and monitor water levels.
Conflict Resolution: Disputes over land use and maintenance responsibilities were addressed through community negotiation meetings facilitated by local leaders.
Evaluation Against Key Criteria:
Represents Community Values: Yes — the project respected local livelihoods, fishing practices, and traditional knowledge.
Addresses Challenges: Yes — it directly reduced flood risk and protected homes and croplands.
Adequately Assesses Vulnerability: Yes — vulnerability assessments were conducted through participatory surveys and mapping.
Demonstrates Conflict Resolution: Yes — local committees mediated disputes and ensured fair participation.
Meets Community Expectations and Needs: Yes — embankment improvements aligned with the most urgent community concerns.
Contributes to Adaptive Capacity: Yes — trained committees and strengthened infrastructure enhance long-term resilience.