Stakeholder Analysis and Power–Influence Comparison: South Moroccan Oases
When I mapped the stakeholders involved in climate adaptation projects in South Moroccan oases and compared them with the Philippine mangrove case, I observed that government agencies and international donors hold the greatest influence because they control funding, policies, and project design. However, local oasis communities—especially small farmers and water users—are the ones who benefit most from successful outcomes, as their livelihoods directly depend on ecosystem health and water availability. NGOs and civil society organizations play an important intermediary role by translating policies into local action and supporting community participation, while researchers contribute scientific knowledge but have limited influence over final decisions. This comparison revealed a clear power imbalance, as traditional water managers, women, and small-scale farmers often have limited voices despite their deep environmental knowledge. I determined stakeholders’ power and influence by considering their control over resources, decision-making authority, and dependency on project outcomes. Comparing my analysis with peers’ perspectives also helped me realize that stakeholder influence can vary depending on local governance structures, highlighting the importance of inclusive and participatory approaches for effective climate adaptation.
I really liked your analysis of the South Moroccan oases. It’s interesting how government agencies and donors hold the most influence, while local communities benefit most, this is similar to the SRP. I also noticed your point about traditional water managers and women having limited voices, which reflects what happens in the Sundarbans too. It shows that formal authority isn’t the only measure of influence; local knowledge and participation are key for making climate adaptation projects succeed.