top of page

ACCESS4ALL Group

Public·2286 members

Discussion Forum on COP Outcomes:

Summary of Key Outcomes (Last 5 COPs – COP24 to COP28):

  • COP24 (Katowice, 2018): Discussions focused on implementing the Paris Rulebook. Loss and damage was acknowledged, but no concrete financial mechanism was established.

  • COP25 (Madrid, 2019): Continued debates on funding; vulnerable countries called for a dedicated finance facility. No binding commitments were made.

  • COP26 (Glasgow, 2021): Glasgow Dialogue was initiated to discuss funding arrangements for loss and damage; recognition of the need for support for vulnerable countries increased.

  • COP27 (Sharm El-Sheikh, 2022): Major milestone: Loss and Damage Fund was agreed upon, aimed at providing financial support to developing countries for climate-related damages. Operational details were still being finalized.

  • COP28 (Dubai, 2023): Fund pledges and commitments were made, but actual disbursement mechanisms remain slow. Non-economic losses and justice issues were highlighted but not fully addressed.

Assessment of Satisfaction:Rating: 2 – Dissatisfied

Justification:

  • While COP27’s agreement to establish a Loss and Damage Fund was historic, progress has been slow in operationalizing it.

  • Financial commitments are still insufficient compared to the scale of loss and damage faced by highly vulnerable countries like Bangladesh.

  • Non-economic losses (cultural, social, psychological) are still largely unaddressed.

  • Political and economic negotiations continue to limit the speed and effectiveness of action.

  • Overall, although the COPs show growing recognition of loss and damage, the gap between pledges and tangible support for vulnerable nations remains significant, leaving countries like Bangladesh at continued risk from climate-induced disasters.

14 Views
James P Grant Brac University Logo
Hiedelberg University Logo
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health Logo
EN Co-funded by the EU_POS.jpg

Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
bottom of page