top of page

ACCESS4ALL Group

Public·2286 members

Over the last five COPs, loss and damage has gradually gained prominence. Early discussions at COP24 and COP25 focused on technical support through the Warsaw International Mechanism and the Santiago Network, but finance commitments were minimal. COP27 marked a historic breakthrough with the agreement to establish a dedicated Loss and Damage Fund and a Transitional Committee to operationalize it, signaling recognition of climate justice for vulnerable nations. At COP28, the Fund was formally operationalized, with the World Bank as interim host and initial pledges secured, though these remain modest. COP29 and COP30 continued discussions, but predictable, scaled financing and clear eligibility criteria are still lacking. Overall, while institutional progress has been made, the scale and reliability of support are insufficient, leading to a neutral assessment (3/5) in terms of satisfaction with outcomes, as vulnerable countries still face significant gaps in addressing both economic and non-economic climate losses.

12 Views
James P Grant Brac University Logo
Hiedelberg University Logo
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health Logo
EN Co-funded by the EU_POS.jpg

Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
bottom of page