1.
Most influential bodies:
Government Agencies
International Donors
Disaster Management Authorities
Most Benefiaries
Forest Dependent Communities
Farming Communities
Marginalized Communities
Roles/Benefits/Level of Influence
Government Agencies: Project Approval/National policy achievement/high (Keep satisfied)
International Donors: Funding/International policy achievement/high (Keep satisfied)
Ministry, Disaster Authorities, and Research Institutions: Analysis, technical assessment/High (Manage closely)
Local actors and informal observers: Facilitation and communication/Closer relationships with communities/Low(Monitor)
Dependent Households and Farming Communities: Communicate their needs/retrieval with their professional activities that guarantee their livelihood. Low (Keep informed) 3. Contribution and dependency:
Government agencies provide the means to research institutions along with ministries to carry out studies on the disaster and plan a resolution route. The authorities transform this research into a tangible project which will be submit to international donors for a potential funding. All the decisions regarding the project are on them.
The local actors and informal observers act as the intermediaries between households and the decision makers. They have the ability to communicate effectively and know the exact role of each stakeholder. They can make pressure on the authorities but do not have power of decision.
The farming communities and households Collaborate with the project teams, allow them to access different places to conduct a comprehensive research and an effective project implementation. They are fully dependent on the project outcome.
4. Power Imbalance Power imbalance is existing. The farming communities may undergo power imbalance effects by not having the opportunity to express their specific needs as the authorities just implement the project in a general manner while there are exising specific needs that needs deeper consideration.