top of page

ACCESS4ALL Group

Public·2286 members

In the Sundarbans Resilience Project, government agencies and international donors hold the most influence through policy and funding control, while local coastal communities benefit the most through improved protection, livelihoods, and resilience; NGOs and researchers support implementation and knowledge, but power imbalances remain as community voices—especially women’s—have limited decision-making influence despite being the most affected.

16 Views

I agree with your assessment of the Sundarbans Resilience Project. The concentration of influence among government agencies and international donors is evident, as they control policy direction, funding, and large-scale implementation. At the same time, local coastal communities are the primary beneficiaries, gaining improved protection from cyclones, strengthened livelihoods, and enhanced long-term resilience.

James P Grant Brac University Logo
Hiedelberg University Logo
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health Logo
EN Co-funded by the EU_POS.jpg

Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
bottom of page